Soil health education and information sharing for sustainable farming communities

Share This Post

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Climate change, lack of appropriate agricultural technology and infrastructure, resource scarcity, degradation of ecosystem services and biodiversity, shortage of farming skills, lack of market access, poor access to inputs, and credit schemes are the main constraints facing small-scale agricultural production in South Africa. Droughts, long dry spells and extreme climatic events often worsen the situation, sometimes resulting in complete crop failures and thereby perpetuating poverty in farming communities (Matlou et al., 2016).

The recent news about the El Niño wave spreading across the world in 2026 is going to have adverse effects, especially on resource-poor producers (WMO, 2026). Addressing these challenges requires more than scientific innovation. It requires collaboration among producers, local communities, research institutions, government, extension services, and other stakeholders to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and promote locally appropriate solutions.

The Agricultural Research Council-Natural Resources and Engineering (ARC-NRE) is committed to address some of these challenges by advancing sustainable soil management practices that restore and improve soil health; and promote resilient food systems in various communities across the country. One approach to achieving this is through awareness and knowledge sharing activities focused on soil health assessment through participatory approaches.

Indicators used to assess soil health

Community information sharing sessions were conducted with producers and local stakeholders in Mamelodi, Pretoria between March and May 2026. Through practical field demonstrations, producers were taught how to assess various indicators of soil health. Soil health is defined as the ability or capacity of the soil to sustain the productivity, diversity, and environmental services of terrestrial ecosystems (FAO, 2020).

It is assessed using three measurable indicators (physical, biological and chemical), which were used to evaluate how well a soil functions. Examples of physical indicators include soil colour, texture, structure, compaction, porosity, aggregate stability and infiltration rate. Biological indicators include the living components of the soil such as microbes, enzymes and earthworms. Soil pH, micro- and macro-nutrients, organic matter and carbon and cation exchange capacity (CEC) are all examples of chemical indicators.

Producers learn how to assess soil

While awareness of soil health is increasing, it was important for producers to have a good understanding of what soil health entails, how it is measured or assessed, and how to manage it for optimal and sustainable delivery of the ecosystem services that soils provide. The three pictures below show researchers and extension practitioners demonstrating to producers how to determine soil texture and assess soil structure in the field without taking soil samples to the laboratory.

Producers are learning how to determine the soil texture by using the ‘sausage’ method.
By learning how to use the ‘sausage’ method to determine soil texture, producers can use the method help them determine the health of the soil.
Producers and researchers are assessing the soil structure.

Simple tools such as spades, water bottles, buckets, corrugated sheets, a measuring container, an infiltration ring and a ruler were used during the assessment. For many smallholder producers, the cost of laboratory soil analysis can be a significant expense or constraint. Hands-on soil health assessments helped reduce laboratory fees, transport costs, and sample-processing expenses. With these skills, producers became active participants in assessing and managing their own soils rather than relying entirely on external experts.

It was observed that hands-on assessment enabled producers to share indigenous knowledge and experiment with various soil health indicators such as soil colour, structure, texture, compaction and water infiltration through direct observation. Several producers indicated that they intend to repeat field assessments throughout the growing season to monitor changes in soil conditions over time. This demonstrates that producers have become active contributors to research, knowledge generation and application rather than passive recipients of information.

Producers teach what they have learned

Knowledge about soil health often remains confined to research institutions, agricultural organisations, or experienced producers, leaving many youths disconnected from one of the world’s most valuable natural resources.  One of the most promising ways to build resilient farming systems is through producer–learner knowledge exchange. At the end of each information-sharing session, farmers were encouraged to share information gained from the sessions with other farmers and school learners in communities.

Some of the producers visited local schools to demonstrate practical farming and soil management techniques, thus creating opportunities for a two-way knowledge exchange between learners and producers. Schools are ideal places to introduce youth to soil health and sustainable agriculture. A school garden was a perfect tool and a strategy to provide hands-on learning experience. Soil health education became more meaningful when learners experienced it firsthand.

As a result, producers demonstrated how to determine soil texture, collect soil samples and make compost for the school garden. The pictures below shows learners conducting practical soil health assessments.

Primary school learners determining soil texture in a school garden.
School learners carrying soil samples which will be used for soil health assessment.

Participatory soil health information-sharing sessions gave producers an opportunity to share indigenous and scientific knowledge, exchanged ideas with learners, promoted sustainable land management practices, strengthened community relationships, and inspired future generations to pursue careers in agriculture. – M Matlou, N Masekwana, L Lötter, E Mohloding, MS Mahlobogwane and B Lehobye, ARC-Natural Resources & Engineering

Related Posts

Weeklikse rooivleispryse / Weekly meat prices

Estimated reading time: 5 minutesPlaashekpryse/Farm gate pricesDie jongste vleispryse...

Weeklikse weer met Johan van den Berg

Estimated reading time: 1 minuteJohan van den Berg is...

Domestic pork industry carcass price statistics – Week 34 of 2026

The weekly pork carcass prices are brought to you...

SA goat breeds suit the Zimbabwean landscape

Estimated reading time: 7 minutesPathisani Ncube has a wholly...

Ontwikkel ’n skerp oog vir rasstandaarde en die metodiek van kleinveebeoordeling

Estimated reading time: 7 minutesDie vertoning en beoordeling van...

The South African rabbit meat industry in the spotlight

Estimated reading time: 7 minutesRabbit meat is not as...